[uf-discuss] rel -vs- rev

[Andy Mabbett]

In message <C4EBE787-52EC-4EE6-A1E1-8F4DD43F0375 at theryanking.com>, Ryan 
King <ryan at theryanking.com> writes

>I don't think 'arbitrary' is a good characterization of the decision.
[...]
>Your characterization of the decision as "out of hand" doesn't account 
>for the several years of discussion that went into it.

But if that discussion isn't adequately documented, or the decision 
isn't adequately explained, it's a reasonable, indeed likely, conclusion 
for a relative newcomer to arrive at, surely?

-- 
Andy Mabbett