[uf-new] item property (was: hAudio: audio-title/album-title vs. recording/album)

Martin McEvoy martin at weborganics.co.uk
Sat Oct 13 15:09:25 PDT 2007

On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 21:31 +0100, Julian Stahnke wrote:
> > Anyway there is only Me at the moment supporting using *item*  
> > instead of
> > a new microformat *track*
> Nope, I too think item would be better. Maybe, if it is too  
> meaningless, together with haudio à la <span class="item haudio">. I  
> don’t know enough about item to say if just item is enough, but I  
> think it even may be. Then again, if we could use item in such a way  
> that we could say ‘if it is haudio, look for properties in child  
> nodes, otherwise use the content of item’, that’d be potentially nice  
> as well.

Thank you Julian i will take that as another vote FOR using *item*
instead of a new proposed microformat *track*

I think track is a too powerful a class name to be immediately used in
hAudio at the first opportunity we get

Track has a vast amount of meaning outside of hAudio, not many of which
mean the same thing.


If we define track now in hAudio we will be stuck with it 
then potentially we will have the same problems as we do with the title
property in hCard



More information about the microformats-new mailing list