[uf-new] item property (was: hAudio: audio-title/album-title vs. recording/album)

Martin McEvoy martin at weborganics.co.uk
Sun Oct 14 14:16:32 PDT 2007

On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 17:03 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Justin Maxwell wrote:
> > and i thought i was helping define a microformat, not practicing my
> > skill in public debate.  so, we're even. :)
> You must be new here. This is the New Microformats Community. We don't
> actually create Microformats, instead we endlessly debate the meaning of
> words and their implied semantics. Sometimes we argue with one another
> just for the hell of it. We are at our best on the weekends, when sane
> people are outside, enjoying their time off from work. :)

 +1 to Manu
> >> If people refer to a songs or other recording as a "track" - as the
> >> evidence [1] shows they do - then we should use that.
> Andy, Martin, Justin, and everyone else that is asserting that TRACK has
> multiple, different meanings: You are all correct.
> TRACK has multiple definitions, nobody is arguing that it doesn't.
> ITEM is also not as semantically accurate as TRACK in hAudio.
> This thread has been identified as hAudio ISSUE #13 and has been
> recorded on the wiki. Please go and leave your feedback/preference for
> TRACK or ITEM if you have been involved in this conversation:
> http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Problem:_Container_property_naming
> -- manu
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new

More information about the microformats-new mailing list