[uf-new] Album Vs audio-title (was hAudio ITEM debate proposal #3)
scott at makedatamakesense.com
Tue Oct 30 06:19:31 PST 2007
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:34 AM, Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>> FN does *not* mean album name. It means *audio* name. Whether or
>>> not that's the same as the album name determines whether or not
>>> we're talking about an album.
> That Is YOUR definition
It is, but only because that's the definition of FN in the wiki:
"The name of the object."
The object of an hAudio is an audio recording, so FN in hAudio means
"the name of the audio recording." The definition of ALBUM on the
other hand, is the name of the album. That the album is sometimes
also the recording does not make those two definitions the same.
Similarly the terms "big" and "elephant" do not have the same meaning
merely because they often refer to the same object.
>> This is a pattern taken directly from hCard, another context in
>> which subtypes are not explicitly stated but can still be
>> determined by which elements are present. If you think hAudio
>> should differ from hCard here, please explain why.
> are you meaning that "fn album" is an optimization based on
> something like the nickname optimization in hCard ?
It's not an optimization, and it's not related to nickname. It's an
indirect way of indicating subtype when a subtype is not explicitly
stated, just like we use the identical value of FN and ORG to indicate
the subtype of the hCard is organization.
> All I am suggesting is that we should forget about any "fn album"
> optimization for now and keep it simple.
It seems to me we're talking about two different definitions of what
those terms mean. Take a look at how FN and ORG work in hCard; it's
the same pattern. If you don't like this pattern, I'd like to hear
why, but you seem to be objecting to a definition of these terms that
doesn't match previous use (e.g. what FN means above), so I don't
really understand your objection.
> Now that item / fn has been accepted to described hAudio tracks,
> there is no real need to complicate hAudio any more than saying that
> audio-title is the main hAudio title and fn is a track title and
> leave it there.
How should we describe a single track and its album title? Currently
we'd do that like this:
I like the song <span class="fn">Everything in Its Right Place</span>
on <span class="album">Kid A</span>.
I'm not clear what you see as the alternative without separate
More information about the microformats-new