[uf-new] hAudio Issue D6: 2008-01-10 hAudio notes inconsistency
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Mon Aug 18 11:14:28 PDT 2008
RE: 2008-01-10 hAudio notes inconsistency 
Raised by Andy Mabbett in
The "Notes" section of the hAudio spec says "By marking up audio content
with the hAudio microformat, the expectation is communicated that
information about the content MAY be indexed. This has no impact on the
copyright of the content itself which the publisher may explicitly
specify using rel-license as specified above.". However, that is the
first and only reference to rel-license on the page.
I initially closed this issue marking it as a typing error rel-licence
is not part of the specification, but the question still remains
"should the hAudio Specification include rel-licence" I have re-opened
this issue in order that this issue be addressed correctly.
The hAudio Specification SHOULD include the rel-license microformat.
1, because rel-licence already implicitly exists in haudio it
just hasn't been discussed yet.
2, I DO think it is valuable to know which audio files I can freely
download no conditions, and ones that may have certain conditions that
must be met before I can download this file.
More information about the microformats-new