[uf-new] Comments proposals

[Martin McEvoy]

Hello David

David Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Toby A Inkster <mail at tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> David Janes wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at
>>> weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>  *  reply[1] (comment-link) 60%
>>>       
>>>>  o By adding "rel-reply" the author is indicating that the page
>>>> http://someblog/post#comment-001 is a reply for the referring page (see
>>>> example).
>>>>         
>> Martin, you've explained this a few times on the list, and I have to admit,
>> this is the first time I've "got it". Yes, this does make sense as a
>> solution. rel="reply bookmark" would be even better.
>>     
>
> I withdraw my comment about semantic nonsense and apologize to Martin
> for my tone. I thought this was the in-reply-to proposal.
>   
No worries David we all say things we shouldn't discourse in any 
discussion like this usually ends in progress in my view ;-)

> However, how is the different than saying a comment is marked up as
> "hentry comment", which will work on close to 100% [1] of the
> exemplars instead of 60%?
>   

I have always liked "hentry comment" I made a fleeting attempt to 
propose it in an earlier message,

http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-November/001889.html

I still think this is the best way to go, but it got lost in the 
following discussion ;-)

> Regards, etc...
>
> [1] there are universal issues for all proposals with blogger DL lists
>
>   
Best wishes

-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/