[uf-new] Question RE: The Process
Scott Reynen
scott at makedatamakesense.com
Tue Jul 20 06:09:25 PDT 2010
On Jul 18, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Craig Shea wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I have done the research on the microformats.org
> site and know that my proposed format does not exist (including using
> existing formats to accomplish my end result). Of course, the members
> of this list could always say "I don't think we need a format for
> that." Would it be helpful to post a link to my blog posts regarding
> my "proposed pre-draft specification" (meant to jumpstart
> brainstorming and discussion with the understanding that it may very
> well change according to community consensus) and an example of its
> use? Or is that jumping the gun?
Well, writing a pre-draft is probably itself jumping the gun, but not at all uncommon. The process is kind of an ideal of how things should work, but it's pretty common for something to come to microformats.org partially-done already. Any reason we shouldn't start talking about what you're actually working on, rather than talking about how to talk about it?
--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list