[uf-discuss] rel="nsfw"

[Scott Reynen]

On Dec 30, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:

> Scott Reynen wrote:
>> "More valuable" is all relative to likelihood to be
>> published.  I believe rel="nsfw" was suggested on this list a
>> while back, and this same vagueness issue was raised at the
>> time.  But I think in practice, almost no one is publishing
>> ratings with links, and many people are publishing "NSFW"
>> warnings.[1]
>
> Can you please provide some examples of real world publishing  
> behavior?

I would be happy to, except ... On Dec 29, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Frances  
Berriman wrote:

> The content-rating got listed under rejected-formats instead [1].
>
> [1]http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats#Content_Rating

I don't have any real world examples that couldn't work with the rel- 
tag suggestion in that rejection.

Peace,
Scott