[uf-discuss] rel="nsfw"

[Mike Schinkel]

Scott Reynen wrote:
> > Scott Reynen wrote:
> >> "More valuable" is all relative to likelihood to be published.  I 
> >> believe rel="nsfw" was suggested on this list a while 
> back, and this 
> >> same vagueness issue was raised at the time.  But I think in 
> >> practice, almost no one is publishing ratings with links, and many 
> >> people are publishing "NSFW"
> >> warnings.[1]
> >
> > Can you please provide some examples of real world publishing 
> > behavior?
> 
> I would be happy to, except ... On Dec 29, 2006, at 9:21 AM, 
> Frances Berriman wrote:
> 
> > The content-rating got listed under rejected-formats instead [1].
> >
> > [1]http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats#Content_Rating
> 
> I don't have any real world examples that couldn't work with 
> the rel- tag suggestion in that rejection.

FWIW, that rel-tag suggestion was unclear to me.  But my question was just
to make sure you provided real world examples as it appeared you were
advocating for a "nsfw" tag with providing examples.

-- 
-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org/