[uf-new] Re: microformats-new Digest, Vol 1, Issue 2
Kilian Valkhof
kilian at kilianvalkhof.com
Tue Feb 20 11:15:50 PST 2007
Hello, thanks for your answers.
The problem most people in the discuss list had, was that you would
define relationships to customers and business related entities using a
"Friends network". This would most likely hold people back in adoption
of using a standard to define those relationships. The link to the
previous discussion in discuss:
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008327.html
and:
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008373.html
Cheers,
Kilian
> Hi.
>
> I think it's just about a name change since business relationship
> and "friends" doesn't really fit. So if I got that right, we should add
> more relationships to XFN and at the same time change the name
> to reflect the new types of relationships available.
>
> While I personally think adding relationships is a good idea, I'm
> not convinced a name change to XRN is required.
>
>
> - Alex
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list