rejected-formats: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ScottReynen (talk | contribs) (→Content Rating: added mention of rel="nsfw" for findability) |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) m (→Content Rating: link to discussion) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Content Rating == | ==Content Rating == | ||
*Suggested: July 2006 ( | *Suggested: July 2006 (later suggested as [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-December/007885.html rel="nsfw"]) | ||
*Discussion list thread [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-July/004942.html] | *Discussion list thread [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-July/004942.html] | ||
*Solution: use [[rel-tag]] | *Solution: use [[rel-tag]] | ||
Revision as of 18:38, 29 December 2006
Previously proposed and rejected Microformats
Below is a listing of microformats that have been suggested and have never made it to a draft version (please add to this list). With each are related discussions and links so that you can find out why they were rejected etc.
The purpose of this page is to help reduce the number of proposals and rejections of the same or similar concept too reguarly. Also, it may serve as a log of which concepts are reguarly proposed and therefore it may be worthwhile to re-evaluate their usefulness.
Content Rating
- Suggested: July 2006 (later suggested as rel="nsfw")
- Discussion list thread [1]
- Solution: use rel-tag
Wine
(The drink, not the software)