rejected-formats: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(If we are rejecting formats, we should give solutions (added solution for content rating format)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Discussion list thread [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-July/004942.html] | *Discussion list thread [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-July/004942.html] | ||
*Solution: use [[rel-tag]] | *Solution: use [[rel-tag]] | ||
==Wine== | |||
*Suggested: November 2006 | |||
*Discussion list threads [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-November/007125.html] [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-November/007179.html] | |||
*Solution: use [[hlisting-proposal]] - Further exploratory discussion required | |||
Revision as of 12:10, 16 November 2006
Previously proposed and rejected Microformats
Below is a listing of microformats that have been suggested and have never made it to a draft version (please add to this list). With each are related discussions and links so that you can find out why they were rejected etc.
The purpose of this page is to help reduce the number of proposals and rejections of the same or similar concept too reguarly. Also, it may serve as a log of which concepts are reguarly proposed and therefore it may be worthwhile to re-evaluate their usefulness.
Content Rating
Wine
- Suggested: November 2006
- Discussion list threads [2] [3]
- Solution: use hlisting-proposal - Further exploratory discussion required