rejected-formats

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(expand reasons for rejection of rel-logo)
Current revision (01:57, 12 February 2013) (view source)
(Logo: main article)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
== Logo ==
== Logo ==
 +
{{main|rel-logo}}
* [[rel-logo|rel="logo"]] [http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=existing-rel-values&diff=44990&oldid=44989 proposed 2011-11-24] to "Specify an SVG logo."
* [[rel-logo|rel="logo"]] [http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=existing-rel-values&diff=44990&oldid=44989 proposed 2011-11-24] to "Specify an SVG logo."
* No need for a new rel value for a specific MIME/content-type. That's what the 'type' attribute is for.
* No need for a new rel value for a specific MIME/content-type. That's what the 'type' attribute is for.
* Pre-existing solutions: '''use <code>rel="icon" type="image/svg+xml"</code>'''. If the intent was to actually convey the semantic of a "logo" differently/distinctly from an "icon", then use [[hcard|hCard]], in particular, the "logo" property. In practice the two semantics are often conflated.
* Pre-existing solutions: '''use <code>rel="icon" type="image/svg+xml"</code>'''. If the intent was to actually convey the semantic of a "logo" differently/distinctly from an "icon", then use [[hcard|hCard]], in particular, the "logo" property. In practice the two semantics are often conflated.
 +
==Pavatar==
==Pavatar==
* [[rel-pavatar|rel="pavatar"]] [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-December/007884.html suggested Dec 28 2006]
* [[rel-pavatar|rel="pavatar"]] [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-December/007884.html suggested Dec 28 2006]

Current revision

Previously proposed and rejected Microformats

Below is a listing of microformats that have been suggested and have never made it to a draft version (please add to this list). With each are related discussions and links so that you can find out why they were rejected etc.

The purpose of this page is to help reduce the number of proposals and rejections of the same or similar concept too reguarly. Also, it may serve as a log of which concepts are reguarly proposed and therefore it may be worthwhile to re-evaluate their usefulness.

Contents


In General

In general, abstract-formats and abstract-properties (i.e. not based on actual real world examples) tend to be rejected quite quickly by the microformats process.

Content Rating

Logo

Main article: rel-logo

Pavatar

Wine

(The drink, not the software)

rejected-formats was last modified: Tuesday, February 12th, 2013

Views